format suggestions[]
I suggest putting quotes in individual sections, rather than at hte top of the page. And perhaps putting images for location pages at the top of pages and centered. I know its not a typical format, but it is one that I rather enjoy. ralok (talk) 01:10, October 8, 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose - The "introductory quotation" quoteboxes belong in the introduction section, as they're more likely to distract when located within substantive article content, though obviously informative quotes (without the quotebox template) can and should be placed within article content. See Help:MOS. With regards to the pictures being centered, I also Oppose: standardized formatting is familiar to wiki users and helps them access the information they want faster. Images are not the star of this wiki; information is. Foman123 (talk) 03:47, October 8, 2013 (UTC)
- Well can we at least put it in a category? it is highly unproffesional to have a page uncategorized, I suggest technology. I thought space craft would be fine because it is a construct that travels through space, you cant just leave it uncategorized. ralok (talk) 04:01, October 8, 2013 (UTC)
- I think we can add the "Storyline" category and I will do so. Until we know more about the nature of the Traveler, though, it's probably inappropriate to place it under any other category. Better to be accurate than to just add categories for the sake of adding categories. ;-) Foman123 (talk) 04:53, October 8, 2013 (UTC)
- Well can we at least put it in a category? it is highly unproffesional to have a page uncategorized, I suggest technology. I thought space craft would be fine because it is a construct that travels through space, you cant just leave it uncategorized. ralok (talk) 04:01, October 8, 2013 (UTC)