Thread:Vektor0/@comment-4246683-20160821104130

I come here to ask about the Armsday article, and perhaps about the way articles on this Wikia are to be styled. Was it my formulation that was deemed incomprehensive that it required reversion? Perhaps you would like me to supply screenshots and observations among a larger sample of occurences to back up the facts presented? Could it be that articles here are intended to be short and to avoid going into details? Or is it rather the case of only staff being permitted to make edits to articles?

In fact, I had thought, according to the Style Guide, that the Armsday article is in fact a stub, as it only serves an introductory purpose, without offering all available information. To my understanding, the Wikia should, among other things, serve to provide a relatively complete source of information to readers who may have never encountered the aspects of the game that they are looking up on this site. 